Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JOR
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Retirement
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Retirement

The Journal of Retirement

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JOR
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

Importance of Costs in Target Date Fund Selection Using Three Morningstar Ratings

C. Edward Chang, Thomas M. Krueger and H. Doug Witte
The Journal of Retirement Spring 2021, jor.2021.1.085; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2021.1.085
C. Edward Chang
is a professor of finance at Missouri State University in Springfield, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas M. Krueger
is the J.R. Manning Endowed Professor of Innovation in Business Education at Texas A&M University-Kingsville in Kingsville, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Doug Witte
is an associate professor of finance at Missouri State University in Springfield, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
Loading

Click to login and read the full article.

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo 

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600

Abstract

Although target date mutual funds (TDFs) have only been around since the mid-1990s, they are now common vehicles for retirement investing. Sixty percent of US companies now automatically funnel employees’ non-directed retirement funds into TDFs, which account for nearly one-quarter of all savings US workers have in 401(k)s. Helping investors pick among TDFs, Morningstar rates past risk-adjusted performance using a star system and provides forward-looking evaluations of more than 2,500 TDFs using either Analyst Ratings or a newly implemented machine-learning-based Quantitative Ratings. Morningstar assigns Analyst Ratings to a smaller subset of TDFs that tend to have been in existence the longest and have the largest size. We find that TDFs with lower fees have significantly higher star ratings than their higher expense counterparts. No-load TDFs have significantly higher star ratings than their load-charging counterparts. In assessing future fund prospects, TDFs with low expense ratios are favored by both analysts and artificial intelligence. TDFs without load charges have significantly better Quantitative Ratings than their load charging counterparts. TDFs with Quantitative Ratings tend to be smaller, younger, and have poorer prior performance than TDFs with Analyst Ratings.

TOPICS: Long-term/retirement investing, mutual funds/passive investing/indexing, information providers/credit ratings

Key Findings

  • ▪ Target-date funds (TDFs) with low expenses and without load charges have significantly higher Morningstar star ratings of past risk-adjusted performance. These same low-cost funds have higher Morningstar Analyst ratings and Quantitative ratings, which estimate future fund prospects of performance.

  • ▪ Regression results suggest Morningstar’s two forward-looking fund ratings are not perfect substitutes. Analyst ratings weight fund expense and fund age more heavily (both negatively) while the computer-generated Quantitative ratings are more positively influenced by past fund performance.

  • ▪ Morningstar’s star ratings, Analyst ratings, and Quantitative ratings all suggest that retirement investing will result in a larger nest egg when attention is restricted to no-load, low-expense TDFs. Additionally, the ratings suggest investors should favor larger but relatively younger funds.

  • © 2021 Pageant Media Ltd
View Full Text

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options

US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045

UK: 0207 139 1600

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Retirement: 9 (4)
The Journal of Retirement
Vol. 9, Issue 4
Race, Gender, and Retirement 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Retirement.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Importance of Costs in Target Date Fund Selection Using Three Morningstar Ratings
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Retirement
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Retirement web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Importance of Costs in Target Date Fund Selection Using Three Morningstar Ratings
C. Edward Chang, Thomas M. Krueger, H. Doug Witte
The Journal of Retirement Apr 2021, jor.2021.1.085; DOI: 10.3905/jor.2021.1.085

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Importance of Costs in Target Date Fund Selection Using Three Morningstar Ratings
C. Edward Chang, Thomas M. Krueger, H. Doug Witte
The Journal of Retirement Apr 2021, jor.2021.1.085; DOI: 10.3905/jor.2021.1.085
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • LITERATURE REVIEW
    • DATA
    • PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACROSS TDF COSTS
    • CONCLUSION
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2022 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 2326-6899 | E-ISSN: 2326-6902

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy