Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JOR
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Retirement
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Retirement

The Journal of Retirement

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JOR
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
Article
Open Access

Editor’s Letter

Brett Hammond
The Journal of Retirement Spring 2019, 6 (4) 1-2; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2019.6.4.001
Brett Hammond
Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In the most recent editor’s letter, I encouraged contributions to the journal that might form the basis for future topic-oriented issues. One of those topics is gender and race, on the grounds that much of what we read about retirement evaluates the aggregate, which is still well represented by the older, male, white work force of the past. We have seen good work on the circumstances and behavior of women and a smaller amount on minorities, but we need additional insights and implications.

The dimension I left out of this topic is income/wealth, which should be considered as well. We tend to focus on the middle to high end of the income/wealth spectrum when we ask about financial security and health, for example. In this issue you will find three articles that are pertinent to discussions about the lower end of the income and wealth spectrum. On the empirical side, Ghilarducci, Radpour and Webb, in “New Evidence on the Effect of Economic Shocks on Retirement Plan Withdrawals,” show that, compared to higher income groups, retirement income adequacy for lower-income households is challenged because they experience more financial shocks and, in the face of a shock, they are more likely to take a withdrawal from their qualified retirement accounts. In contrast, Biggs focuses, not on qualified plans, but on Social Security, and argues in “How Hard Should We Push the Poor to Save for Retirement?” that higher Social Security income replacement rates mitigate low retirement savings rates for those at the bottom of the US income scale. In his article, “Social Security Reforms,” Reichenstein recognizes that the program’s redistributive feature is the driving force behind higher retirement income replacement rates for lower income workers. He presents a case for transforming the program into a required savings program with limited redistribution.

Another topic on which I am encouraging your contributions is in the spirit of Bill Sharpe’s online book and toolkit, Retirement Income Analysis (with scenario matrices) or RISMAT. A cluster of three articles in this issue address the question of retirement income design. To that end, Totten and Siegel, in “Combining Conventional Investing with a Lifetime Income Guarantee: A Blueprint for Retirement Security,” show us a practical approach to combining guaranteed income with risky assets to improve overall retirement income, both its amount and chances of lasting a lifetime. They and others combat the belief that annuities are inflexible and suffer from low interest rates, both of which makes them unattractive. Instead, combined with other savings, annuities and Social Security can create a floor under retirement income so that the risky portion of assets and retirement income can be managed dynamically to achieve better outcomes. Similarly and more qualitatively, Turner shows in “The Halloween Candy Problem: An Intuitive Model for the Drawdown Phase of the Life Cycle,” that a dynamic approach to retirement withdrawals can improve lifetime income. Gabudean and Weiss, in “How to Evaluate Target-Date Funds: A Practical Guide,” make the case that, to understand target date fund selection, quantitative data must be combined with qualitative criteria. Both types of measures should be used to evaluate wealth-focused versions of return and risk concepts, the link between retirement contributions and portfolio returns, a target-date fund’s ability to support income in retirement, and individuals’ behavior around retirement, a period where risk to invested wealth is greatest. They go on to develop a practical guide and dashboard for TDF selection.

To assist us all in plan design, Clark, Nyce, Ritter and Shoven combine the results of several employer surveys in “Employer Concerns and Responses to an Aging Workforce.” They find that most employers believe that issues associated with managing an older workforce will increase in the next few years, but concerns vary across the country by industry, firm demographics and other firm characteristics. In considering tools for managing retirement behavior, firms are reluctant to implement formal phased retirement programs, but, on a case-by-case basis are interested in part-time and return-to-work programs as well as other measures.

Finally, in addition to encouraging your submissions in the areas of retirement income design and the needs and behavior of women, minorities, and lower income workers, we would benefit from your recommendations on which books the journal should review. Feel free to reach me here (brett.hammond{at}capgroup.com) with suggestions, recommendations and comments.

Brett Hammond

Editor

  • © 2019 Pageant Media Ltd

PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Retirement: 6 (4)
The Journal of Retirement
Vol. 6, Issue 4
Spring 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Retirement.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor’s Letter
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Retirement
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Retirement web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor’s Letter
Brett Hammond
The Journal of Retirement May 2019, 6 (4) 1-2; DOI: 10.3905/jor.2019.6.4.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Editor’s Letter
Brett Hammond
The Journal of Retirement May 2019, 6 (4) 1-2; DOI: 10.3905/jor.2019.6.4.001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Editor’s Letter
  • BOOK REVIEW: Is There a Retirement Crisis? An Exploration of the Current Debate
  • Editor’s Letter
Show more Article
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2021 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 2326-6899 | E-ISSN: 2326-6902

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy